Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Q&A: Colombia's civil conflict VIA BBC News

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-12447532



A member of an anti-narcotics squad stands by a burning hut during a raid in Colombia
Colombia and the US have spent billions of dollars on the drugs fight
Colombia has suffered decades of civil conflict and has long been the world's biggest producer of cocaine.
President Alvaro Uribe, who came to power in 2002 and was re-elected in 2006, pursued a hardline stance against left-wing guerrillas while making tentative peace overtures.

His successor, Juan Manuel Santos, took office in 2010 vowing to seek an end to the conflict. In August he announced plans to hold peace talks with the largest rebel group, the Farc.


Why has Colombia historically experienced high levels of violence?
Colombia, in common with many Latin American nations, evolved as a highly segregated society, split between the traditionally rich families of Spanish descent and the vast majority of poor Colombians, many of whom are of mixed race.

This group provided a natural constituency for left-wing insurgents - with two main groups, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Farc) and the ELN (National Liberation Army).

At the other end of the political spectrum were right-wing paramilitaries, with roots in vigilante groups set up decades ago by landowners for protection against rebels. The main group was the AUC - the United Self-Defence Forces of Colombia, which officially at least has demobilised.

In a country where the presence of the state has always been weak, the result was a grinding war on multiple fronts, with the civilian population caught in the crossfire and often deliberately targeted for "collaborating".
Human rights advocates blamed paramilitaries for massacres, "disappearances", and cases of torture and forced displacement. Rebel groups are behind assassinations, kidnapping and extortion.

What is the situation today?
The rebels, although much weakened, are still active. Another factor has been the emergence of what the government calls Bacrims, namely criminal bands, which are involved in drug-trafficking and extortion.
These groups emerged after the demobilisation of the AUC paramilitaries in 2006.

The cocaine trade is the main motor of the armed conflict, providing hundreds of millions of dollars in funding for the illegal armed groups.

Who suffers?
It is difficult to find reliable statistics on the toll from the violence in Colombia. What is clear is that the scale of the suffering has been huge.

Especially at risk are those with high-profile roles in the community - including social leaders, political activists, human rights campaigners and trade unionists. Many indigenous communities have also suffered attacks.
Violent crime and kidnappings have, however, decreased in recent years. In May 2008, the government announced that kidnaps were at a 20-year low. Figures showed that from a high in 2000, when more than 3,500 people were seized, in 2007 just under 400 people were kidnapped. Of these, some 179 were freed.

But the fate of those taken hostage by rebels or seized by common criminals continues to resonate in Colombian society.

Over the decades, some three million people have been internally displaced by the fighting.
The UN says that many displaced people often end up living in shanty towns around the cities, where they have little access to health or educational services.

What are the prospects for peace?
Although there have been many attempts at negotiations over the course of the conflict, these have always faltered.

In recent years, the tough security policy pursued by President Uribe and Mr Santos, then his defence minister, inflicted a series of significant blows on the rebels.

Several rebel leaders have died and there has been a high number of desertions from guerrilla ranks.
However, the rebels do still operate across large rural areas, where the presence of the state is weak.
In August 2012, President Juan Manuel Santos announced that "exploratory" discussion with Farc rebels were under way. The ELN was also said to have expressed interest in talks.

What about paramilitary fighters?
Since 2003, some 31,000 paramilitaries handed in their weapons under a peace deal.

A controversial justice and peace law passed in 2005 meant that paramilitary fighters were eligible for reduced jail terms - of no more than eight years - if they gave details of their involvement in torture, killings and other crimes.
Critics argued that paramilitaries guilty of serious human rights violations could end up serving only token jail terms.

The government points to figures which it says show a decreasing level of violence as evidence that its strategy is working.

The extent of the paramilitaries' influence over and involvement in local, regional and national politics came to the fore in 2007.

In a scandal dubbed the "parapolitics", a dozen members of congress were jailed and dozens more politicians investigated for links to the AUC.

Why is the US involved in Colombia?
Up to 90% of all cocaine on American streets comes from Colombia, so the US administration is keen to tackle the supply at source.

Since 2000, Washington has spent some $6bn (£3.8bn) on Plan Colombia, under which Colombian forces receive training, equipment and intelligence to root out drug-traffickers and eliminate coca crops.

Initially, the US Congress stipulated that this money should only be used against drug lords and not for any other campaigns, such as the government's fight with left-wing rebels. However, since 2002 the US administration indicated that some aid was being spent on counter-terrorism.

Human rights groups say the line between the war on drugs and the war on rebels is increasingly blurred.
They say Colombia's rebels have been disproportionately targeted in Plan Colombia, though it is the paramilitaries who have been most involved in drug-trafficking.


The US and Colombia signed a controversial deal in October 2009 to allow the US military use of several Colombian airbases.

The two countries said this was to counter drug-trafficking and terrorism.
Some of Colombia's neighbours expressed concern at what they saw as an increased US military presence in South America.

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites (Does that mean littl' ol' me? ~Peta)


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
HELP-Matrix Humane-Liberation-Party Blog
http://help-matrix.blogspot.com/

Humane-Liberation-Party Portal
http://help-matrix.ning.com/

@Peta_de_Aztlan Blog
http://peta-de-aztlan.blogspot.com/
On Twitter @Peta_de_Aztlan
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

555HELPLOGO

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please keep comments humane!